feat: improve ideation view #507
Conversation
- Added a helper function to map priority levels to badge variants in the IdeationDashboard. - Improved UI elements in SuggestionCard for better spacing and visual hierarchy. - Updated PromptCategoryGrid and PromptList components with enhanced hover effects and layout adjustments for a more responsive design. - Refined button styles and interactions for better user experience across components. These changes aim to improve the overall usability and aesthetics of the ideation view.
Shironex
added
Enhancement
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR centralizes prompt customization throughout the codebase by introducing a dynamic system that retrieves and applies customizable prompts via Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Route as Route Handler
participant Settings as SettingsService
participant Helper as getPromptCustomization
participant Merge as mergeXPrompts
participant Model as LLM Provider
Route->>Helper: getPromptCustomization(settingsService, '[Category]')
Helper->>Settings: Fetch custom prompts for category
Settings-->>Helper: CustomPrompt or undefined
Helper->>Merge: mergeXPrompts(customPrompts)
Merge-->>Helper: ResolvedXPrompts with all fields
Helper-->>Route: Resolved prompt object
Route->>Route: Extract desired prompt from object
Route->>Model: Send request with customized prompt
Model-->>Route: Response
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~75 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
✨ Finishing touches
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (40)
✏️ Tip: You can disable this entire section by setting Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @Shironex, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the application's AI capabilities by introducing a robust and centralized prompt customization framework. It also delivers substantial improvements to the user experience in key areas like ideation and feature management, alongside performance gains for bulk operations and broader AI model compatibility. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request significantly enhances the user interface and experience of the ideation view. The changes introduce a more polished and modern design across the ideation dashboard, prompt category grid, and prompt list. Key improvements include richer hover effects, better visual hierarchy, more descriptive statuses, and consistent use of the design system's theme. The code quality is high, and the changes are well-implemented. I have one suggestion to improve type safety in the ideation-dashboard.tsx component.
| ): | ||
| | 'default' | ||
| | 'secondary' | ||
| | 'destructive' | ||
| | 'outline' | ||
| | 'success' | ||
| | 'warning' | ||
| | 'error' | ||
| | 'info' => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The return type for getPriorityVariant is broader than the actual values returned by the function. It includes variants like 'default', 'destructive', 'outline', and 'success' which are not part of the function's output. To improve type safety and make the function's contract more precise, it's better to tighten the return type to only include the variants that can actually be returned: 'error', 'warning', 'info', and 'secondary'.
): 'error' | 'warning' | 'info' | 'secondary' => {
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.